Difference between revisions of "Chuzan seikan"
(Created page with "*''Compiled: 1650, Shô Shôken'' *''Japanese'': 中山世鑑 ''(chuuzan seikan)'' The ''Chûzan Seikan'', or "Mirror of Chûzan," was the first...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*''Japanese'': 中山世鑑 ''(chuuzan seikan)'' | *''Japanese'': 中山世鑑 ''(chuuzan seikan)'' | ||
| − | The ''Chûzan Seikan'', or "Mirror of [[Chuzan|Chûzan]]," was the first official history of Okinawa to be compiled. It was written in [[1650]] by high-ranking [[Ryukyu Kingdom|Ryukyuan]] government minister [[Sho Shoken|Shô Shôken]]. | + | The ''Chûzan Seikan'', or "Mirror of [[Chuzan|Chûzan]]," was the first official history of Okinawa to be compiled. It was written in [[1650]], in [[Japanese language|Japanese]], by high-ranking [[Ryukyu Kingdom|Ryukyuan]] government minister [[Sho Shoken|Shô Shôken]]. |
The work consists of five volumes in total. The first volume covers the royal lineage of [[Shunten]], the second the lines of [[Eiso]] and [[Satto]], the third the line of [[Sho Hashi|Shô Hashi]], the fourth that of [[Sho En|Shô En]], and the fifth the reign of [[Sho Sei|Shô Sei]]. There is no discussion of the reign of [[Sho Shin|Shô Shin]]; the reason for this is unknown. | The work consists of five volumes in total. The first volume covers the royal lineage of [[Shunten]], the second the lines of [[Eiso]] and [[Satto]], the third the line of [[Sho Hashi|Shô Hashi]], the fourth that of [[Sho En|Shô En]], and the fifth the reign of [[Sho Sei|Shô Sei]]. There is no discussion of the reign of [[Sho Shin|Shô Shin]]; the reason for this is unknown. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The text describes Okinawans as having come from Japan<ref name=smits>Smits, Gregory. ''Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1999. pp51-62.</ref>, and relates a narrative of Okinawan subordinate relations to [[Satsuma province]] going back many centuries, a fiction to which King [[Sho Nei|Shô Nei]] was forced to agree roughly 40 years earlier, following [[Invasion of Ryukyu|Satsuma's invasion of the kingdom]]. This reflects the fact that, unlike some more Sinophilic administrators in the history of the kingdom, Shô Shôken frequently expressed concern with how Ryukyuan practices would look to Satsuma, which he saw as model for policy and practice<ref name=smits/>. | The text describes Okinawans as having come from Japan<ref name=smits>Smits, Gregory. ''Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1999. pp51-62.</ref>, and relates a narrative of Okinawan subordinate relations to [[Satsuma province]] going back many centuries, a fiction to which King [[Sho Nei|Shô Nei]] was forced to agree roughly 40 years earlier, following [[Invasion of Ryukyu|Satsuma's invasion of the kingdom]]. This reflects the fact that, unlike some more Sinophilic administrators in the history of the kingdom, Shô Shôken frequently expressed concern with how Ryukyuan practices would look to Satsuma, which he saw as model for policy and practice<ref name=smits/>. | ||
| − | The text includes the story of 12th century samurai [[Minamoto no Tametomo]] being the father of Shunten, and thus progenitor of the Ryukyuan royal lineage. Scholars today consider this story a falsehood, but the tale was believed quite widely at the time, appearing in numerous Japanese works on Ryukyuan history, including [[Arai Hakuseki]]'s ''[[Nantoshi|Nantôshi]]''. The ''Chûzan seikan'' is among the earliest works in which this story appears, but the actual origin of the story is unclear. | + | The text includes the story of 12th century samurai [[Minamoto no Tametomo]] being the father of Shunten, and thus progenitor of the Ryukyuan royal lineage. This served to link the Ryukyuan royal family to the Japanese imperial line, via Tametomo, the [[Seiwa Genji]] line of the [[Minamoto clan]], and [[Emperor Seiwa]], and also to the [[Tokugawa clan]] (who also claimed descent from the Seiwa Genji) in tune with the political leanings of the time, as Ryûkyû had just been subjugated by Satsuma some 40 years earlier, and Shô Shôken was a member of a faction at court advocating a more pro-Japanese stance. Scholars today consider this story and link to the Minamoto a falsehood, but the tale was believed quite widely at the time, appearing in numerous Japanese works on Ryukyuan history, including [[Arai Hakuseki]]'s ''[[Nantoshi|Nantôshi]]''. The ''Chûzan seikan'' is among the earliest works in which this story appears, but the actual origin of the story is unclear. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
*"[http://ryukyushimpo.jp/news/storyid-42106-storytopic-121.html Chûzan seikan]," Okinawa Compact Encyclopedia 沖縄コンパクト事典, Ryukyu Shimpo, 1 March 2003. | *"[http://ryukyushimpo.jp/news/storyid-42106-storytopic-121.html Chûzan seikan]," Okinawa Compact Encyclopedia 沖縄コンパクト事典, Ryukyu Shimpo, 1 March 2003. | ||
| + | *Gregory Smits, "Rethinking Ryukyu," ''International Journal of Okinawan Studies'' 6:1 (2015), 1. | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 15 November 2016
- Compiled: 1650, Shô Shôken
- Japanese: 中山世鑑 (chuuzan seikan)
The Chûzan Seikan, or "Mirror of Chûzan," was the first official history of Okinawa to be compiled. It was written in 1650, in Japanese, by high-ranking Ryukyuan government minister Shô Shôken.
The work consists of five volumes in total. The first volume covers the royal lineage of Shunten, the second the lines of Eiso and Satto, the third the line of Shô Hashi, the fourth that of Shô En, and the fifth the reign of Shô Sei. There is no discussion of the reign of Shô Shin; the reason for this is unknown.
Emulating the political culture of Chinese dynastic histories, the Chûzan seikan speaks often of the Mandate of Heaven, and represents the final rulers of fallen dynasties (such as Shô Toku, last ruler of the First Shô Dynasty) as violent and cruel, distracted by dalliances, or otherwise lacking in virtue.
The text describes Okinawans as having come from Japan[1], and relates a narrative of Okinawan subordinate relations to Satsuma province going back many centuries, a fiction to which King Shô Nei was forced to agree roughly 40 years earlier, following Satsuma's invasion of the kingdom. This reflects the fact that, unlike some more Sinophilic administrators in the history of the kingdom, Shô Shôken frequently expressed concern with how Ryukyuan practices would look to Satsuma, which he saw as model for policy and practice[1].
The text includes the story of 12th century samurai Minamoto no Tametomo being the father of Shunten, and thus progenitor of the Ryukyuan royal lineage. This served to link the Ryukyuan royal family to the Japanese imperial line, via Tametomo, the Seiwa Genji line of the Minamoto clan, and Emperor Seiwa, and also to the Tokugawa clan (who also claimed descent from the Seiwa Genji) in tune with the political leanings of the time, as Ryûkyû had just been subjugated by Satsuma some 40 years earlier, and Shô Shôken was a member of a faction at court advocating a more pro-Japanese stance. Scholars today consider this story and link to the Minamoto a falsehood, but the tale was believed quite widely at the time, appearing in numerous Japanese works on Ryukyuan history, including Arai Hakuseki's Nantôshi. The Chûzan seikan is among the earliest works in which this story appears, but the actual origin of the story is unclear.
References
- "Chûzan seikan," Okinawa Compact Encyclopedia 沖縄コンパクト事典, Ryukyu Shimpo, 1 March 2003.
- Gregory Smits, "Rethinking Ryukyu," International Journal of Okinawan Studies 6:1 (2015), 1.
