Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kodai-in (d. 1624)"
Active discussions
m (Talk:Koudai-In moved to Talk:Kodai-In: Usual spelling) |
m (LordAmeth moved page Talk:Kodai-in to Talk:Kodai-in (d. 1624): disambig) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Kodai-In for the title, but Kôdai-In for all occurences within the article [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 22:33, 6 November 2006 (PST) | Kodai-In for the title, but Kôdai-In for all occurences within the article [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 22:33, 6 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Anachronism == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How could she retire to the Kodai-ji in 1601 if she built/established it in 1605? (I understand that there's the possibility she simply retired to the place that would later become the Kodai-ji, but that's still not quite what's worded in the article.) [[User:LordAmeth|LordAmeth]] 07:02, 23 January 2008 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 1 September 2013
Koudai-In? Kodai-In?--Shikisoku 22:31, 6 November 2006 (PST)
Kodai-In for the title, but Kôdai-In for all occurences within the article Nagaeyari 22:33, 6 November 2006 (PST)
Anachronism
How could she retire to the Kodai-ji in 1601 if she built/established it in 1605? (I understand that there's the possibility she simply retired to the place that would later become the Kodai-ji, but that's still not quite what's worded in the article.) LordAmeth 07:02, 23 January 2008 (PST)