• Other Names: 儒道 (judou), 儒学 (jugaku)
  • Japanese: 儒教 (jukyou)

Confucianism is a range of philosophies which trace their origin to the teachings of Confucius, who lived in China in the 6th-5th centuries BCE. Though originally based in the Analects of Confucius (C: Lún Yǔ, J: Rongo), which purport to be a record of the teachings of Confucius himself, "Confucianism" evolved over the centuries, absorbing elements from other philosophies, and developing into a number of strains of Neo-Confucianism, the most prominent of which developed in the Song Dynasty, articulated by scholars including Zhu Xi, in the Ming Dynasty under Wang Yangming and others, and in Tokugawa Period Japan, represented by scholars such as Arai Hakuseki and Hayashi Razan.

Adopted by the Imperial Court of the Han Dynasty as the chief political philosophy of the state, Confucianism remained the foundation of Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Ryukyuan political philosophy, or at least profoundly influential, in one form or another, throughout the Current Era (i.e. the last two thousand years). In China, Korea, and Ryûkyû in particular, a Confucian scholar-bureaucracy formed the core of political administration, with elites studying the Confucian Classics in order to be selected for official posts in government service. The political beliefs of various strains of Confucianism were profoundly influential in Japan as well.

The Confucian Gentleman

Confucius' teachings include both considerations of politics and statecraft, and of ideals for personal behavior, etiquette, refinement and cultivation. Scholar-bureaucrats and literati throughout East Asia cultivated an identity informed by the latter, and by Confucius' concept of the ideal "gentleman" (士, C: shì, J: shi, or 君子, C: jūnzi, J: kunshi), who epitomized the values of humanity or humaneness (仁, C: rén, J: nin), justice or righteousness (義, C: , J: gi), and filial piety (孝, C: xiào, J: ).

However, the character of the figures commonly described in English as "Confucian scholars" in fact developed out of a combination of philosophies and other cultural elements and influences, including Taoism and Buddhism. The disconnect between this tradition and the core, original, Confucian philosophy is evident in the fact that the standard Japanese terms for "Confucianism" do not incorporate the name Confucius (孔子) itself, but rather employ the term ju (C: ). The most common Japanese term for "Confucianism" is thus not Kôshigaku (孔子学), "the teachings of Confucius," but rather jugaku (儒学, "the study of "), jukyô (儒教, "the teachings of "), or judô (儒道, "the way of )[1]. Ju, or in Chinese, literally meaning "gentle," was used as early as Confucius' own time to refer to his followers, and has come to refer to the broad set of concepts associated with this tradition of the refined "Confucian" gentleman, and the various teachings such a gentleman-scholar is said to follow and espouse. Some historians have also pointed out that in the Han Dynasty, the classical canon was not yet set, and included a wide range of classical works which did not between them present a coherent attitude or worldview.[2]

Values and Ideals

In addition to the core values of rén, , and xiào which every Confucian gentleman should epitomize, Confucius also emphasized the concept of (礼, J: rei), meaning proper ritual behavior or decorum. To live in accordance with Confucianism meant observing correct etiquette, and doing so with the correct mindset or emotion behind it.

The correct performance of proper decorum also extends into behaving properly according to one's role, or place, and properly according to hierarchical relationships with others. Thus, another of the key concepts expressed in the Analects is that of the five relationships: ruler and subject, father and son, husband and wife, older and younger brother, and between friends. All other relationships were taken to be modeled on one of these. Four of the five relationships are unequal, and hierarchical, but all are reciprocal: the ruler has obligations to his subjects, just as they have to him; the father has obligations to his sons, and the husband to his wife. These ideals also meant that rulers, peasants, artisans, merchants, and so forth each had their requisite roles to play in society, and that high or low one should perform one's role correctly and to the fullest, in order for all of society to function harmoniously and prosperously.

Confucianism in China Today

Since the May Fourth Movement of 1919, Confucianism (along with a misguided application of the term "feudalism") has for many in China become a catch-all for undesirable and oppressive practices of the past. Political leaders of the time denounced Confucianism as the ideology enforcing and enabling the conservative and patriarchal oppression of the Chinese people, and especially of Chinese women. Mao Zedong claimed he would work to free women from their subordinate position under Confucianism, and state ideology in Communist China since then has, nominally, claimed full and complete gender equality among its ideals.[3]

While nearly all pre-modern (and modern) cultures around the world were (are) heavily patriarchal in their various ways, and Confucianism is certainly no exception, many have also pointed out that many of the quotes often cited as proof of Confucianism's patriarchal nature are taken out of context, or have been misinterpreted. Besides, even if traditional culture was discriminatory towards women, some argue, still Confucianism is not fundamentally an ideology of oppression, and it can be reinterpreted, reappraised, recovered to still have great value for today.[3]

Confucianism in Japan

Confucianism entered Japan during the Nara period, if not earlier, as the Japanese state incorporated Chinese governmental technologies & philosophies. The Neo-Confucianism of Zhu Xi and others was introduced to Japan by Zen monks in the Kamakura period.[4]

However, it was not until the Edo period that Confucianism & Neo-Confucianism became more thoroughly investigated and more widely adopted.[4] Confucian scholars such as Nakae Tôju, Yamazaki Ansai, and Itô Jinsai, among many others, wrote numerous treatises on political, societal, and cosmological theory, and Confucian scholars such as Arai Hakuseki, Hayashi Razan, and other members of the Hayashi clan, became fixtures at the shogun's court as some of his top advisors; many daimyô maintained Confucian scholars as advisors as well. Neo-Confucianism in the vein of Zhu Xi became the philosophical orthodoxy in Japan beginning in 1790.[5]

Confucianism in Korea

Confucianism (K: yugyo) and a writing system based on the Chinese language were already in use in the Korean Three Kingdoms by the 4th century. Some scholars believe that both may have been introduced as early as the 2nd century BCE.[6]

King Sosurim of Koguryo established a National Confucian Academy (太学, K: taehak) in 372, and several centuries later, King Gwangjong of Goryeo (r. 925-975) established a system of Confucian examinations for selecting scholar-officials to be appointed to government posts.[6] Buddhism remained dominant, however, over Confucianism in Korea for over a thousand years, with Confucianism only first becoming dominant in the 15th century. At that time, the Joseon Court adopted Neo-Confucianism (K: seongrihak) in the vein of Zhu Xi (K: Joo Hui) as the chief guiding political philosophy of the court.[6] Some scholars argue that the Confucianization of Korean society was not complete until the 17th century, and the 17th-18th centuries saw considerable ritual controversies.[7]

References

  • "Confucius and the Analects," Sources of Chinese Tradition, 41.
  1. Not to be confused, of course, with the martial art jûdô 柔道.
  2. Conrad Schirokauer, et al, A Brief History of Chinese and Japanese Civilizations, Fourth Edition, Cengage Learning (2012), 57.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Schirokauer et al, 61-62.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Albert M. Craig, The Heritage of Japanese Civilization, Second Edition, Prentice Hall (2011), 85-86.
  5. Craig, 88.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Gallery labels, Pacific Asia Museum.[1]
  7. Evelyn Rawski, Early Modern China and Northeast Asia: Cross-Border Perspectives, Cambridge University Press (2015), 125.