Difference between revisions of "Joi"
m (added to terminology) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''Japanese'': 攘夷 | + | ''Japanese'': 攘夷 (''joui)'' |
+ | |||
+ | ''Jôi'' literally means "Expel the Barbarians", and was usually used as part of "[[Sonno|Sonnô]] Jôi" ("Revere the Emperor, Expel the Barbarians") as a political slogan during the [[Bakumatsu period]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Origins== | ||
+ | The term originates in the [[Neo-Confucianism|Neo-Confucian]] writings of [[Zhu Xi]] ([[1130]]-[[1200]]), who wrote of "revering the [[Zhou Dynasty|Zhou dynastic]] house, and sweeping away (or eradicating) what is barbarian." This comes in a commentary on a passage from the [[Analects of Confucius]] in which [[Confucius]] praises [[Guan Zhong]]<!--管仲--> for helping [[Duke Huan of Qi]]<!--齊桓公--> rectify customs & prevent the common people from adopting foreign (barbarian) ways of doing things; this, despite the fact that Guan effected this violently and harshly, and not through the more ideal methods of benevolent rule. Still, Confucius writes, if not for Guan Zhong, "we might well be wearing our hair down and folding our robes to the left."<ref>Wakabayashi, 20.</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The emphasis is thus on ensuring the maintenance of [[Sinocentric world order|civilized]] [[Confucianism|Confucian]] etiquette and values, and on eliminating barbaric customs, rather than explicitly referring to any expulsion of foreign ''individuals''. Prior to 1825 or so, Japanese thinkers likely associated the term ''jôi'' chiefly or exclusively with this meaning. As Tokugawa era Confucian scholar [[Ito Jinsai|Itô Jinsai]] interpreted this idea, "a ruler performed the act of ''jôi'' by morally transforming alien peoples and preventing his own people from adopting alien ways; he eradicated what is culturally barbarian and ensured that customs in his land conformed to Middle Kingdom ritual and righteousness."<ref>Wakabayashi, 27.</ref> It was only in the 1790s that this "cultural" concept of ''jôi'', as [[Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi]] refers to it, began to transform into a more militaristic notion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Transformation== | ||
− | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | *[[Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi]], ''Anti-Foreignism and Western Learning in Early Modern Japan'', Harvard University Press (1992), 20-21. | ||
+ | <references/> | ||
+ | |||
[[Category:Bakumatsu]] | [[Category:Bakumatsu]] | ||
[[Category:Edo Period]] | [[Category:Edo Period]] | ||
[[Category:Terminology]] | [[Category:Terminology]] |
Revision as of 20:31, 2 March 2014
Japanese: 攘夷 (joui)
Jôi literally means "Expel the Barbarians", and was usually used as part of "Sonnô Jôi" ("Revere the Emperor, Expel the Barbarians") as a political slogan during the Bakumatsu period.
Origins
The term originates in the Neo-Confucian writings of Zhu Xi (1130-1200), who wrote of "revering the Zhou dynastic house, and sweeping away (or eradicating) what is barbarian." This comes in a commentary on a passage from the Analects of Confucius in which Confucius praises Guan Zhong for helping Duke Huan of Qi rectify customs & prevent the common people from adopting foreign (barbarian) ways of doing things; this, despite the fact that Guan effected this violently and harshly, and not through the more ideal methods of benevolent rule. Still, Confucius writes, if not for Guan Zhong, "we might well be wearing our hair down and folding our robes to the left."[1]
The emphasis is thus on ensuring the maintenance of civilized Confucian etiquette and values, and on eliminating barbaric customs, rather than explicitly referring to any expulsion of foreign individuals. Prior to 1825 or so, Japanese thinkers likely associated the term jôi chiefly or exclusively with this meaning. As Tokugawa era Confucian scholar Itô Jinsai interpreted this idea, "a ruler performed the act of jôi by morally transforming alien peoples and preventing his own people from adopting alien ways; he eradicated what is culturally barbarian and ensured that customs in his land conformed to Middle Kingdom ritual and righteousness."[2] It was only in the 1790s that this "cultural" concept of jôi, as Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi refers to it, began to transform into a more militaristic notion.
Transformation
References
- Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi, Anti-Foreignism and Western Learning in Early Modern Japan, Harvard University Press (1992), 20-21.