| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | He became an active anthropologist in his own right, traveling to Okinawa, Taiwan, Korea, Manchuria, Siberia, Sakhalin and elsewhere, and producing a considerable amount of scholarship. His book ''Yûshi izen no Nihon'' ("Prehistoric Japan")<!--有史以前の日本--> became a bestseller in the Taishô period.<ref name=yonetani25>Yonetani. p25.</ref> He became an assistant professor at Tokyo Imperial University in 1922, and later went on to secure professorships at Kokugakuin and Sophia Universities in Tokyo, as well as serving as an associate professor at Yenching University in Beijing.<ref>"[http://kotobank.jp/word/%E9%B3%A5%E5%B1%85%E7%AB%9C%E8%94%B5 Torii Ryûzô]." ''Digital-ban Nihon jinmei daijiten'' ("Digital Version Encyclopedia of Japanese People", デジタル版 日本人名大辞典). Kodansha, 2009. Accessed via Kotobank.jp, 17 Oct 2010.</ref> | | He became an active anthropologist in his own right, traveling to Okinawa, Taiwan, Korea, Manchuria, Siberia, Sakhalin and elsewhere, and producing a considerable amount of scholarship. His book ''Yûshi izen no Nihon'' ("Prehistoric Japan")<!--有史以前の日本--> became a bestseller in the Taishô period.<ref name=yonetani25>Yonetani. p25.</ref> He became an assistant professor at Tokyo Imperial University in 1922, and later went on to secure professorships at Kokugakuin and Sophia Universities in Tokyo, as well as serving as an associate professor at Yenching University in Beijing.<ref>"[http://kotobank.jp/word/%E9%B3%A5%E5%B1%85%E7%AB%9C%E8%94%B5 Torii Ryûzô]." ''Digital-ban Nihon jinmei daijiten'' ("Digital Version Encyclopedia of Japanese People", デジタル版 日本人名大辞典). Kodansha, 2009. Accessed via Kotobank.jp, 17 Oct 2010.</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Torii's work on Okinawa centered on assertions of the origins of the Okinawan and Japanese people, and the connections or differences between them. Through an examination of pottery, ''[[magatama]]'' and other artifacts, and of the skin color of people from different islands, he determined that the people of modern-day [[Yaeyama]] are descended from [[Yayoi people]] who traveled there via/from [[Kyushu]]. He distinguished, prehistorically, three peoples active in the region: Ainu, Ryukyuans, and "Japanese proper," making a series of claims as to when and where these peoples were active in Okinawa and in the Japanese mainland.<ref name=yonetani25/> | + | Torii asserted that the Japanese, [[Ainu]], and Ryukyuan peoples were all descended from the same [[Jomon period|Jômon]] origins (which he called "Ainu"), as well as intermixing with a southern people and a continental people. Like others of his time, he used this idea of common shared origins to justify Japanese control over [[Hokkaido|Hokkaidô]], the [[Ryukyu Islands]], and Korea.<ref>Gregory Smits, ''Early Ryukyuan History: A New Model'', University of Hawaii Press (2024), 70.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | + | Torii's work on Okinawa centered on assertions of the origins of the Okinawan and Japanese people, and the connections or differences between them. Through an examination of pottery, ''[[magatama]]'' and other artifacts, and of the skin color of people from different islands, he determined that the people of modern-day [[Yaeyama]] are descended from [[Yayoi people]] who traveled there via/from [[Kyushu]]. He distinguished, prehistorically, three peoples active in the region: Ainu, Ryukyuans, and "Japanese proper," making a series of claims as to when and where these peoples were active in Okinawa and in the Japanese mainland.<ref name=yonetani25/> |
| | In the end, he described the modern-day Okinawan people as closely related to the Japanese, citing evidence such as the similarities between artifacts found in Yaeyama, Okinawa and Kyushu, and their dramatic difference from those found in Taiwan, while at the same time categorizing the Okinawans as separate from the "Japanese proper."<ref>Yonetani. p26.</ref> | | In the end, he described the modern-day Okinawan people as closely related to the Japanese, citing evidence such as the similarities between artifacts found in Yaeyama, Okinawa and Kyushu, and their dramatic difference from those found in Taiwan, while at the same time categorizing the Okinawans as separate from the "Japanese proper."<ref>Yonetani. p26.</ref> |
| | | | |