Changes

== notes & sources ==

== notes & sources ==

We're still going on a case by case basis, but it isn't always necessary to footnote every piece of info from a source unless it's a direct quote, so we've mostly been just listing the sources in the "references" section (I left them in the [[kenjutsu]] article assuming that you'll be adding the info later).

We're still going on a case by case basis, but it isn't always necessary to footnote every piece of info from a source unless it's a direct quote, so we've mostly been just listing the sources in the "references" section.

I think that until we have a substantial collection of bujutsu, we should probably leave out the more specific "~jutsu" category links.  Once we get a long list of articles, we can create the categories on a case by case basis.   

I think that until we have a substantial collection of bujutsu, we should probably leave out the more specific "~jutsu" category links.  Once we get a long list of articles, we can create the categories on a case by case basis.   

Also, because we aren't necessarily footnoting every piece of info that comes from a book we list as a source, it isn't necessary to footnote "sources needed" - they can be assumed to have come from one of the books listed as a reference.  But if the info could be contentious, it is good to footnote it specifically with the source.  But rather than footnoting "sources needed", just tag the whole article with one of the following tags:

Also, because we aren't necessarily footnoting every piece of info that comes from a book we list as a source, it isn't necessary to footnote "sources needed" - they can be assumed to have come from one of the books listed as a reference (I left them in the [[kenjutsu]] article assuming that you'll be adding the info later).  But if the info could be contentious, it is good to footnote it specifically with the source.  But rather than footnoting "sources needed", just tag the whole article with one of the following tags:

<nowiki>

<nowiki>