Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kira Yoshinaka"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* What is difference between ''Source'' and ''Reference''?--[[User:Shikisoku|Shikisoku]] 00:18, 30 January 2007 (PST) | * What is difference between ''Source'' and ''Reference''?--[[User:Shikisoku|Shikisoku]] 00:18, 30 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *None, really, except that I should have used 'References' to keep things consistent. I'll go fix it now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Tatsunoshi]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Too much opinion?== | ||
| + | :I read this article for the first time and it seems to express an opinion more than stating the facts, as [[User:LordAmeth]] pointed out. A short essay may be appropriate as an opinion paper, but I'm not sure it is appropriate here. Should we create a separate section for it (e.g. ==Arguments for Lord Kira==) or move the opinion to a more specific article? Or should we just go in and remove the opinion as much as possible and just lay down the facts?--[[User:JLBadgley|JLBadgley]] 04:18, 2 December 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | :It does back up its opinions with sources - I think it is fine as is, it could benefit from more straight facts. Otherwise, the entire thing would have to be written from complete scratch, and this added to a section of it. --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 11:28, 2 December 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 2 December 2007
- What is difference between Source and Reference?--Shikisoku 00:18, 30 January 2007 (PST)
- None, really, except that I should have used 'References' to keep things consistent. I'll go fix it now.
Too much opinion?
- I read this article for the first time and it seems to express an opinion more than stating the facts, as User:LordAmeth pointed out. A short essay may be appropriate as an opinion paper, but I'm not sure it is appropriate here. Should we create a separate section for it (e.g. ==Arguments for Lord Kira==) or move the opinion to a more specific article? Or should we just go in and remove the opinion as much as possible and just lay down the facts?--JLBadgley 04:18, 2 December 2007 (PST)
- It does back up its opinions with sources - I think it is fine as is, it could benefit from more straight facts. Otherwise, the entire thing would have to be written from complete scratch, and this added to a section of it. --Kitsuno 11:28, 2 December 2007 (PST)
