Difference between revisions of "User talk:JLBadgley"
m (notes) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I hope folks will use this to let me know what I need to do... I'm still a novice at this Wiki thing. [[User:JLBadgley|JLBadgley]] | I hope folks will use this to let me know what I need to do... I'm still a novice at this Wiki thing. [[User:JLBadgley|JLBadgley]] | ||
| − | == notes == | + | == notes & sources == |
| − | We're still going on a case by case basis, but it isn't always necessary to footnote every piece of info from a source unless it's a direct quote, so we've mostly been just listing the sources in the "references" section. | + | We're still going on a case by case basis, but it isn't always necessary to footnote every piece of info from a source unless it's a direct quote, so we've mostly been just listing the sources in the "references" section. |
| + | |||
| + | I think that until we have a substantial collection of bujutsu, we should probably leave out the more specific "~jutsu" category links. Once we get a long list of articles, we can create the categories on a case by case basis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, because we aren't necessarily footnoting every piece of info that comes from a book we list as a source, it isn't necessary to footnote "sources needed" - they can be assumed to have come from one of the books listed as a reference. But if the info could be contentious, it is good to footnote it specifically with the source. But rather than footnoting "sources needed", just tag the whole article with one of the following tags: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | {{stub}} - a short article with missing info. | ||
| + | {{verify}} - an article with information that seems questionable or incorrect, or with info that doesn't match the references. | ||
| + | {{draft}} - An article that is messy or poorly formatted. </nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 10:41, 25 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 25 May 2007
Josh's Talk Page
I hope folks will use this to let me know what I need to do... I'm still a novice at this Wiki thing. JLBadgley
notes & sources
We're still going on a case by case basis, but it isn't always necessary to footnote every piece of info from a source unless it's a direct quote, so we've mostly been just listing the sources in the "references" section.
I think that until we have a substantial collection of bujutsu, we should probably leave out the more specific "~jutsu" category links. Once we get a long list of articles, we can create the categories on a case by case basis.
Also, because we aren't necessarily footnoting every piece of info that comes from a book we list as a source, it isn't necessary to footnote "sources needed" - they can be assumed to have come from one of the books listed as a reference. But if the info could be contentious, it is good to footnote it specifically with the source. But rather than footnoting "sources needed", just tag the whole article with one of the following tags:
{{stub}} - a short article with missing info. {{verify}} - an article with information that seems questionable or incorrect, or with info that doesn't match the references. {{draft}} - An article that is messy or poorly formatted.
--Kitsuno 10:41, 25 May 2007 (PDT)
