Changes

38 bytes added ,  00:40, 13 January 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:  
:You don't mean calendars from the Edo period, do you? [[User:Seven|Seven]] 19:23, 12 January 2007 (PST)
 
:You don't mean calendars from the Edo period, do you? [[User:Seven|Seven]] 19:23, 12 January 2007 (PST)
   −
Not page references, basically if you add info, we want to get sources - wikipedia is a pile of useless crap without sources, so I want to make this stand above the generally horrible wicrapedia. Basically, all that means is just put the book you get the info from in the "references" section on any given article. The "research books" section is just that, a list of research books, but they have nothing to do with the writing of the article - the "references" section does. So just add whatever book(s) you use to the references section when you add info.  Quick and easy and keeps this better than Wicrapedia - it keeps it verifiable and useful.  Obviously if you are just cleaning up a draft or whatever, you don't need to list a source.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 20:39, 12 January 2007 (PST)
+
Not page references, basically if you add info, we want to get sources - for example wikipedia, which hardly ever cites its sources, is a pile of useless crap, so I want to make this stand far above the generally horrible wicrapedia. Basically, all that means is just put the book you get the info from in the "references" section on any given article. The "research books" section is just that, a list of research books, but they have nothing to do with the writing of the article - the "references" section does. So just add whatever book(s) you use to the references section when you add info.  Quick and easy and keeps this better than Wicrapedia - it keeps it verifiable and useful.  Obviously if you are just cleaning up a draft or whatever, you don't need to list a source.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 20:39, 12 January 2007 (PST)