contributor
26,977
edits
Changes
→Subjective tourist information
But I don't think we can be too sensitive about "subjectivity." If one troubles to write a detailed article about something, some personal feelings or involvement may get through. Of course, there should not be much subjectivity, but this Wiki has the advantage that editors have to be approved and so are relatively sensible (and the disadvantage that not many are editing), so I don't think we need an absolute rule forbidding the slightest subjective expression.--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 01:01, 19 February 2009 (PST)
But I don't think we can be too sensitive about "subjectivity." If one troubles to write a detailed article about something, some personal feelings or involvement may get through. Of course, there should not be much subjectivity, but this Wiki has the advantage that editors have to be approved and so are relatively sensible (and the disadvantage that not many are editing), so I don't think we need an absolute rule forbidding the slightest subjective expression.--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 01:01, 19 February 2009 (PST)
::Oh, I wasn't trying to say that Kenrokuen isn't worth a visit, that I disagree with the recommendation. Rather, I was just saying that it seemed off to me that we were making recommendations at all, as if we're a tourist guide, not an encyclopedia.
::But you make good points. There's no need to be strict on this, and the editors are all good people, as you say. [[User:LordAmeth|LordAmeth]] 06:31, 19 February 2009 (PST)