Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amaterasu Omikami"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think both are correct. But it seems "Takamanohara" is more common. | I think both are correct. But it seems "Takamanohara" is more common. | ||
I am going to edit it. Thanks--[[User:Shikisoku|Shikisoku]] 01:05, 3 December 2006 (PST) | I am going to edit it. Thanks--[[User:Shikisoku|Shikisoku]] 01:05, 3 December 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Romanization== | ||
| + | To be honest, I prefer Susa no O, as it's that way in most of my books. I've gotten used to that. I don't see the logic in placing a dash inbetween Susano and O, either. What is your reasoning beyond various internet precedents? I'd rather we go by book precedents. [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 19:37, 1 March 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 1 March 2007
Picture
The picture "Kira Clavell as Amaterasu" may gives wrong image of Amaterasu.--Shikisoku 04:36, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- I moved it to the bottom to get it out of the way. --Kitsuno 09:26, 2 December 2006 (PST)
Takamanohara
Shouldn't Taka Amano Hara be Takamanohara? Nagaeyari 08:01, 2 December 2006 (PST)
I think both are correct. But it seems "Takamanohara" is more common.
I am going to edit it. Thanks--Shikisoku 01:05, 3 December 2006 (PST)
Romanization
To be honest, I prefer Susa no O, as it's that way in most of my books. I've gotten used to that. I don't see the logic in placing a dash inbetween Susano and O, either. What is your reasoning beyond various internet precedents? I'd rather we go by book precedents. Nagaeyari 19:37, 1 March 2007 (PST)
