− | The Self-Strengthening Movement was a political movement within the [[Qing Dynasty]] government of late 19th century China, which advocated the adoption of Western military technology in service of the defense of a traditional [[Confucianism|Confucian]] Chinese state. The rhetoric and thought process behind the Movement bore many similarities with movements leading up to the [[Meiji Restoration]] in Japan. | + | The Self-Strengthening Movement was a political movement within the [[Qing Dynasty]] government of late 19th century China, which advocated the adoption of Western military technology in service of the defense of a traditional [[Confucianism|Confucian]] Chinese state. The rhetoric and thought process behind the Movement bears many parallels with thought and movements in Japan at [[Bakumatsu|that same time]], including the idea of ''[[wakon yosai|wakon yôsai]]'' ("Japanese spirit, Western knowledge"). |
| [[Feng Guifen]] ([[1809]]-[[1874]]) was among the leading thinkers in this movement. In his [[1861]] ''Protests from the Study of Jiaobin'', he argues that "we have only one thing to learn from the barbarians, and that is strong ships and effective guns,"<ref>de Bary, 46.</ref> and that everything else - reforms in government, improved use of land, labor, and natural resources - should come from the Emperor setting the country back onto the right track, in accordance with Confucian virtuous rule. He suggested that arsenals and shipyards be constructed in each of the [[treaty ports]], and that Chinese who successfully learned how to reproduce (or improve upon) Western weapons should be given official scholarly status (''jǔrén'' or ''jìnshì'' degrees), as if they had passed the [[Chinese imperial examinations]]. He suggested that China was not inferior to the Western countries in its land, climate, resources, or anything else, and that indeed the Chinese people were inherently superior in intelligence and potential, but simply were not being educated or applied properly; Feng was among many at this time who criticized the civil service exams for training people only in stereotyped essays, formal calligraphy, memorization and rigid thinking, and who advocated instead a combination of Confucian studies with study of sciences, engineering and the like. | | [[Feng Guifen]] ([[1809]]-[[1874]]) was among the leading thinkers in this movement. In his [[1861]] ''Protests from the Study of Jiaobin'', he argues that "we have only one thing to learn from the barbarians, and that is strong ships and effective guns,"<ref>de Bary, 46.</ref> and that everything else - reforms in government, improved use of land, labor, and natural resources - should come from the Emperor setting the country back onto the right track, in accordance with Confucian virtuous rule. He suggested that arsenals and shipyards be constructed in each of the [[treaty ports]], and that Chinese who successfully learned how to reproduce (or improve upon) Western weapons should be given official scholarly status (''jǔrén'' or ''jìnshì'' degrees), as if they had passed the [[Chinese imperial examinations]]. He suggested that China was not inferior to the Western countries in its land, climate, resources, or anything else, and that indeed the Chinese people were inherently superior in intelligence and potential, but simply were not being educated or applied properly; Feng was among many at this time who criticized the civil service exams for training people only in stereotyped essays, formal calligraphy, memorization and rigid thinking, and who advocated instead a combination of Confucian studies with study of sciences, engineering and the like. |
| *Wm. Theodore de Bary and Wing-sit Chan, ''Sources of Chinese Tradition'', vol 2, Columbia University Press (1964), 45-49. | | *Wm. Theodore de Bary and Wing-sit Chan, ''Sources of Chinese Tradition'', vol 2, Columbia University Press (1964), 45-49. |