contributor
27,126
edits
Changes
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCreated page with "*''Born: 1666'' *''Died: 1728'' *''Japanese'': 荻生徂徠 ''(Ogyuu Sorai)'' Ogyû Sorai was a prominent Confucian & ''kangaku'' scholar of the early 18th centur..."
*''Born: [[1666]]''
*''Died: [[1728]]''
*''Japanese'': 荻生徂徠 ''(Ogyuu Sorai)''
Ogyû Sorai was a prominent Confucian & ''[[kangaku]]'' scholar of the early 18th century, who led a school of thought rejecting [[Zhu Xi|Zhu Xi's]] [[Neo-Confucianism|Neo-Confucian]] interpretations of Confucian texts and thinking.
Though he would later rise to prominence, Sorai started off with considerable difficulties. A ''[[rakugo]]'' story entitled "Sorai Tofu" relates how he opened his own academy in [[Edo]], but suffered from considerable financial difficulties until he was hired into the service of ''daimyô'' [[Yanagisawa Yoshiyasu]] in [[1696]]. Through association with Yanagisawa, Sorai was able to learn vernacular (and not only classical, textual) Chinese language, and had many opportunities to participate in study & discussion sessions with others examining and contemplating classical Chinese texts.
While in the service of Yanagisawa, however, Sorai had yet to achieve much prominence, being known chiefly only within certain circles. Yanagisawa fell from power around the turn of the century, and in [[1709]] Sorai once again opened his own academy, and struggled on his own for a brief time. The [[1711]] [[Korean embassy to Edo]] brought the opportunity for Sorai's school of teaching to finally gain some greater recognition and prestige. A student of his, [[Yamagata Shunan|Yamagata Shûnan]] ([[1687]]-[[1752]]), met the embassy, and engaged in a philosophical debate with them. Though Sorai's (and thus Shûnan's) rejection of Zhu Xi's interpretations of Confucian thought earned him no favor with the Korean scholars (avid supporters of Korean versions of the Zhu Xi school of Neo-Confucianism), the debate itself provided an opportunity to present Sorai's school as a qualified school of philosophy, capable of engaging in such a high-level debate.
This led to Sorai gaining considerable recognition and prestige. In the 1710s, he was invited to write a preface for the ''[[Six Courses in Morals]]'', a [[Ming Dynasty]] text obtained by [[Shogun]] [[Tokugawa Tsunayoshi]] via [[Ryukyu Kingdom|Ryûkyû]]; this new version was published and widely distributed in Japan beginning in [[1722]].<ref>''Minoji wo aruku Ryûkyû shisetsu'' 美濃路をゆく琉球使節, Bisai Museum of History and Folklore 尾西市歴史民俗資料館, Bisai, Aichi (2004), 8.</ref> Also in that year (1722), Sorai was appointed advisor to the Shogun [[Tokugawa Yoshimune]].
He published a commentary on the [[Ming Dynasty]] law code in [[1725]].
His students included [[Dazai Shundai]] and [[Taki Kakudai]], among other prominent scholars of the 18th century. His school remained strong after his death, and for example his disciples continued to debate with Korean scholars on occasion.
{{stub}}
==References==
*Doyoung Park, "A New Perspective on the Korean Embassy (Chôsen Tsûshinshi): The View from the Intellectuals in Tokugawa Japan," ''Studies in Asia Series'' IV, 3:1 (2013), 19-21.
<references/>
[[Category:Edo Period]]
[[Category:Scholars and Philosophers]]
*''Died: [[1728]]''
*''Japanese'': 荻生徂徠 ''(Ogyuu Sorai)''
Ogyû Sorai was a prominent Confucian & ''[[kangaku]]'' scholar of the early 18th century, who led a school of thought rejecting [[Zhu Xi|Zhu Xi's]] [[Neo-Confucianism|Neo-Confucian]] interpretations of Confucian texts and thinking.
Though he would later rise to prominence, Sorai started off with considerable difficulties. A ''[[rakugo]]'' story entitled "Sorai Tofu" relates how he opened his own academy in [[Edo]], but suffered from considerable financial difficulties until he was hired into the service of ''daimyô'' [[Yanagisawa Yoshiyasu]] in [[1696]]. Through association with Yanagisawa, Sorai was able to learn vernacular (and not only classical, textual) Chinese language, and had many opportunities to participate in study & discussion sessions with others examining and contemplating classical Chinese texts.
While in the service of Yanagisawa, however, Sorai had yet to achieve much prominence, being known chiefly only within certain circles. Yanagisawa fell from power around the turn of the century, and in [[1709]] Sorai once again opened his own academy, and struggled on his own for a brief time. The [[1711]] [[Korean embassy to Edo]] brought the opportunity for Sorai's school of teaching to finally gain some greater recognition and prestige. A student of his, [[Yamagata Shunan|Yamagata Shûnan]] ([[1687]]-[[1752]]), met the embassy, and engaged in a philosophical debate with them. Though Sorai's (and thus Shûnan's) rejection of Zhu Xi's interpretations of Confucian thought earned him no favor with the Korean scholars (avid supporters of Korean versions of the Zhu Xi school of Neo-Confucianism), the debate itself provided an opportunity to present Sorai's school as a qualified school of philosophy, capable of engaging in such a high-level debate.
This led to Sorai gaining considerable recognition and prestige. In the 1710s, he was invited to write a preface for the ''[[Six Courses in Morals]]'', a [[Ming Dynasty]] text obtained by [[Shogun]] [[Tokugawa Tsunayoshi]] via [[Ryukyu Kingdom|Ryûkyû]]; this new version was published and widely distributed in Japan beginning in [[1722]].<ref>''Minoji wo aruku Ryûkyû shisetsu'' 美濃路をゆく琉球使節, Bisai Museum of History and Folklore 尾西市歴史民俗資料館, Bisai, Aichi (2004), 8.</ref> Also in that year (1722), Sorai was appointed advisor to the Shogun [[Tokugawa Yoshimune]].
He published a commentary on the [[Ming Dynasty]] law code in [[1725]].
His students included [[Dazai Shundai]] and [[Taki Kakudai]], among other prominent scholars of the 18th century. His school remained strong after his death, and for example his disciples continued to debate with Korean scholars on occasion.
{{stub}}
==References==
*Doyoung Park, "A New Perspective on the Korean Embassy (Chôsen Tsûshinshi): The View from the Intellectuals in Tokugawa Japan," ''Studies in Asia Series'' IV, 3:1 (2013), 19-21.
<references/>
[[Category:Edo Period]]
[[Category:Scholars and Philosophers]]
