Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kato no ran"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, I am a little puzzed by "the Hanagura no Ran. At that time, the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict, so Ujitsuna felt Yoshimoto should have been grateful for his support and took this marriage as an affront." But in the article on Hanagura no Ran, it states the Hojo & Takeda and Yoshimot were all on the same side, so what does "the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict" mean?--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 02:11, 26 March 2008 (PDT) | Also, I am a little puzzed by "the Hanagura no Ran. At that time, the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict, so Ujitsuna felt Yoshimoto should have been grateful for his support and took this marriage as an affront." But in the article on Hanagura no Ran, it states the Hojo & Takeda and Yoshimot were all on the same side, so what does "the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict" mean?--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 02:11, 26 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll have to check the book for the kanji and the question. I think they were in conflict around the time that Yoshimoto was married. --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 02:58, 26 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:58, 26 March 2008
What are the kanji for this?
Also, I am a little puzzed by "the Hanagura no Ran. At that time, the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict, so Ujitsuna felt Yoshimoto should have been grateful for his support and took this marriage as an affront." But in the article on Hanagura no Ran, it states the Hojo & Takeda and Yoshimot were all on the same side, so what does "the Hôjô and the Takeda had been in conflict" mean?--Bethetsu 02:11, 26 March 2008 (PDT)
I'll have to check the book for the kanji and the question. I think they were in conflict around the time that Yoshimoto was married. --Kitsuno 02:58, 26 March 2008 (PDT)
