Difference between revisions of "Itowappu"
(Created page with "*''Japanese'': 糸割符 ''(ito wappu)'' The ''itowappu'' system was a system in which a guild of Kyoto, Sakai, and Osaka-based textile merchants was granted a mo...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The ''itowappu'' system was a system in which a guild of [[Kyoto]], [[Sakai]], and [[Osaka]]-based textile merchants was granted a monopoly on the domestic sale of Chinese [[silk]] imported by [[VOC|Dutch]] and [[Chinese in Nagasaki|Chinese]] merchants in [[Nagasaki]]. The system was implemented by the [[Tokugawa shogunate]] in the 17th century in efforts to better manage the silk market. | The ''itowappu'' system was a system in which a guild of [[Kyoto]], [[Sakai]], and [[Osaka]]-based textile merchants was granted a monopoly on the domestic sale of Chinese [[silk]] imported by [[VOC|Dutch]] and [[Chinese in Nagasaki|Chinese]] merchants in [[Nagasaki]]. The system was implemented by the [[Tokugawa shogunate]] in the 17th century in efforts to better manage the silk market. | ||
| − | The system was put into place in [[1604]], and abolished in [[1655]], after which trade in silk returned to being free. The competition of a free market, however, drove prices up, aggravating the problem the shogunate was seeking to solve: namely, that the shogunate desired to see more silk come into the country, and less [[silver]] flow out | + | The system was put into place in [[1604]], and initially applied only to Iberian traders, providing them with a set number of Japanese trading partners who would be able to effect some control over the prices, while Dutch and ''[[shuinsen]]'' merchants were still free to trade with whomever they liked. The system was later expanded to cover the Chinese in [[1631]] and the Dutch in [[1641]] as well, while the ''shuinsen'' system was abolished. However, the fall of the [[Ming Dynasty]] in [[1644]] led to a severe disruption of normal economic patterns, and prices began to rise considerably. |
| + | |||
| + | The ''itowappu'' system was then abolished in [[1655]], after which trade in silk returned to being free. The competition of a free market, however, drove prices up, aggravating the problem the shogunate was seeking to solve: namely, that the shogunate desired to see more silk come into the country, and less [[silver]] flow out, and also to claim for official coffers a greater portion of the proceeds of trade. Attempts to curtail speculation by having Nagasaki prices posted in [[Osaka]] had little effect. | ||
The system was revived in [[1685]]... | The system was revived in [[1685]]... | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
*Robert Hellyer, ''Defining Engagement'', Harvard University Press (2009), 52. | *Robert Hellyer, ''Defining Engagement'', Harvard University Press (2009), 52. | ||
| + | *[[Marius Jansen]], ''China in the Tokugawa World'', Harvard University Press (1992), 30. | ||
[[Category:Edo Period]] | [[Category:Edo Period]] | ||
[[Category:Economics]] | [[Category:Economics]] | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 11 October 2014
- Japanese: 糸割符 (ito wappu)
The itowappu system was a system in which a guild of Kyoto, Sakai, and Osaka-based textile merchants was granted a monopoly on the domestic sale of Chinese silk imported by Dutch and Chinese merchants in Nagasaki. The system was implemented by the Tokugawa shogunate in the 17th century in efforts to better manage the silk market.
The system was put into place in 1604, and initially applied only to Iberian traders, providing them with a set number of Japanese trading partners who would be able to effect some control over the prices, while Dutch and shuinsen merchants were still free to trade with whomever they liked. The system was later expanded to cover the Chinese in 1631 and the Dutch in 1641 as well, while the shuinsen system was abolished. However, the fall of the Ming Dynasty in 1644 led to a severe disruption of normal economic patterns, and prices began to rise considerably.
The itowappu system was then abolished in 1655, after which trade in silk returned to being free. The competition of a free market, however, drove prices up, aggravating the problem the shogunate was seeking to solve: namely, that the shogunate desired to see more silk come into the country, and less silver flow out, and also to claim for official coffers a greater portion of the proceeds of trade. Attempts to curtail speculation by having Nagasaki prices posted in Osaka had little effect.
The system was revived in 1685...
References
- Robert Hellyer, Defining Engagement, Harvard University Press (2009), 52.
- Marius Jansen, China in the Tokugawa World, Harvard University Press (1992), 30.
