Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sengoku Period"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do you think it would be more productive, before we add many more battles, to alphabetize according to the LAST letter of a battle name? People don't want to skim through all the B's for a blasted BATTLE they are look for, if you know what I mean. However, skimming to S would give them Sekigahara, with ease. What do you think? [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 17:55, 12 September 2006 (PDT) | Do you think it would be more productive, before we add many more battles, to alphabetize according to the LAST letter of a battle name? People don't want to skim through all the B's for a blasted BATTLE they are look for, if you know what I mean. However, skimming to S would give them Sekigahara, with ease. What do you think? [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 17:55, 12 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | :By last letter you mean the frst letter of the location itself, and yeah I agree. Was thinking about doing so myself earlier. | ||
| + | :--[[User:Kryo|Kryo]] 18:12, 12 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:12, 12 September 2006
Do you think it would be more productive, before we add many more battles, to alphabetize according to the LAST letter of a battle name? People don't want to skim through all the B's for a blasted BATTLE they are look for, if you know what I mean. However, skimming to S would give them Sekigahara, with ease. What do you think? Nagaeyari 17:55, 12 September 2006 (PDT)
- By last letter you mean the frst letter of the location itself, and yeah I agree. Was thinking about doing so myself earlier.
- --Kryo 18:12, 12 September 2006 (PDT)
