Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Categories debate: removed old content) |
m (archives talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please note any additions to the main page that must be added, and an admin will update the main page accordingly. To start discussions here, use the "+" sign under the "edit tools" category on the left. | Please note any additions to the main page that must be added, and an admin will update the main page accordingly. To start discussions here, use the "+" sign under the "edit tools" category on the left. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== If you need the Shogun == | == If you need the Shogun == | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 11 November 2006
Please note any additions to the main page that must be added, and an admin will update the main page accordingly. To start discussions here, use the "+" sign under the "edit tools" category on the left.
If you need the Shogun
If you have a question about a page you are working on, post it to that page's talk section, but also post it on my own personal talk page, just to make sure I see it within a reasonable amount of time. --Kitsuno 03:53, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
New Categories
I have added the Yayoi category and the Jomon category. Secondly, for the stub clay pots section, are all the categories appropriate? Nagaeyari 18:24, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
- "Clay pots are everywhere"? lol... I wouldn't put it in resource articles unless you plan on writing about how they are dated, or what can be learned from them, etc. - the resource articles are articles that give information on how to figure something out, at least that is my idea of it - like the "age" one, or articles about how to calculate between western and japanese dates, or articles about the japanese calendar, or general articles about the use of ceremonial titles. Things like that. Otherwise, it should be fine. --Kitsuno 19:27, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
- Speaking of historical categories, should we also put in hakuho and azuchi-momoyama, or just eventually create articles about them, along with the rest of the eventual historical period articles? --Kitsuno 19:54, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
