Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jujutsu"

From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
These rules have no source...seems like a fanboy page. [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 22:25, 5 January 2007 (PST)
 
These rules have no source...seems like a fanboy page. [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 22:25, 5 January 2007 (PST)
 
:Baian or someone said they'd get to it "after the hollidays" - I already tagged this on the bujutsu task force as needing an edit.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 22:36, 5 January 2007 (PST)
 
:Baian or someone said they'd get to it "after the hollidays" - I already tagged this on the bujutsu task force as needing an edit.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 22:36, 5 January 2007 (PST)
 +
 +
== Reference ==
 +
 +
Can you cite the publication the article came from in case anyone wants to get thier hands on it?  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 19:48, 17 January 2007 (PST)
 +
 +
The article was given to me by the author. I think it was published in some form by his university. I'll try to confirm it. [[User:Baian|Baian]] 23:18, 17/01/07 (EST)
 +
 +
:Yeah, if you could figure out if it was published, the info would be great - if it wasn't published, label it as ''unpublished manuscript''.

Latest revision as of 02:35, 18 January 2007

These rules have no source...seems like a fanboy page. Nagaeyari 22:25, 5 January 2007 (PST)

Baian or someone said they'd get to it "after the hollidays" - I already tagged this on the bujutsu task force as needing an edit. --Kitsuno 22:36, 5 January 2007 (PST)

Reference

Can you cite the publication the article came from in case anyone wants to get thier hands on it? --Kitsuno 19:48, 17 January 2007 (PST)

The article was given to me by the author. I think it was published in some form by his university. I'll try to confirm it. Baian 23:18, 17/01/07 (EST)

Yeah, if you could figure out if it was published, the info would be great - if it wasn't published, label it as unpublished manuscript.