Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naito Julia"

From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
(checked death date)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm confused by this: "She passed away away March 28, 1627 (1627/2/11)" - it isn't clear which is the Japanese date, which is why I prefer writing it out. However, the Sengoku Jinmei Jiten puts her date of death at 3rd month, 25th day, rather than 28th.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 09:08, 26 November 2006 (PST)
+
I'm confused by this: "She passed away away March 28, 1627 (1627/2/11)" - it isn't clear which is the Japanese date, (or isn't it more clear when you write it out?) However, the Sengoku Jinmei Jiten puts her date of death at 3rd month, 25th day, rather than 28th.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 09:08, 26 November 2006 (PST)
 +
 
 +
I checked, the ''Kiristutokyo Rekishi Jiten'' definately has March 28th (Western date). As one of its sources is a book on the Beatas-Kai, and the author probably went to Manila and saw Julia's death record with her own eyes, I think it must be closer to the primary source than the ''Jinmei Jiten''.
 +
 
 +
I will try writing out the Japanese date (which I calculated). Maybe that will be clearer. Of course this is unusual in that the primary source is western dating.--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 00:49, 29 November 2006 (PST)

Latest revision as of 03:49, 29 November 2006

I'm confused by this: "She passed away away March 28, 1627 (1627/2/11)" - it isn't clear which is the Japanese date, (or isn't it more clear when you write it out?) However, the Sengoku Jinmei Jiten puts her date of death at 3rd month, 25th day, rather than 28th. --Kitsuno 09:08, 26 November 2006 (PST)

I checked, the Kiristutokyo Rekishi Jiten definately has March 28th (Western date). As one of its sources is a book on the Beatas-Kai, and the author probably went to Manila and saw Julia's death record with her own eyes, I think it must be closer to the primary source than the Jinmei Jiten.

I will try writing out the Japanese date (which I calculated). Maybe that will be clearer. Of course this is unusual in that the primary source is western dating.--Bethetsu 00:49, 29 November 2006 (PST)