Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shogun"
From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (answer to question) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What kind of description you want us to give kenjutsu and so on? You want to keep it brief (aka dictionnary desc.)or go as deep as possible? | What kind of description you want us to give kenjutsu and so on? You want to keep it brief (aka dictionnary desc.)or go as deep as possible? | ||
| − | It's pretty much impossible to give a record history or origin of those disciplines. | + | It's pretty much impossible to give a record history or origin of those disciplines. Baian |
| − | + | :Best case would be a history, however brief, even if it is just who developed it and when, and what clan they were associated with, or what province, and then a short description of what the style entails, or what makes it "different" from others. Beyond that, I'm not much of an expert, but that's my best guess - so it might be useful to get more input at the [[SamuraiWiki_talk:Bujutsu task force|task force talk page]]. --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 19:48, 24 November 2006 (PST) | |
Revision as of 22:48, 24 November 2006
What kind of description you want us to give kenjutsu and so on? You want to keep it brief (aka dictionnary desc.)or go as deep as possible? It's pretty much impossible to give a record history or origin of those disciplines. Baian
- Best case would be a history, however brief, even if it is just who developed it and when, and what clan they were associated with, or what province, and then a short description of what the style entails, or what makes it "different" from others. Beyond that, I'm not much of an expert, but that's my best guess - so it might be useful to get more input at the task force talk page. --Kitsuno 19:48, 24 November 2006 (PST)
