Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abe no Hirafu"
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Yeah, he's not a samurai-I had this placed before our plethora of categories sprung up and never got around to changing it. So all warriors before the Heian period are now "other historical figures"? If that's the case, I'll get around to changing this and I think a few others. [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 12:08, 15 September 2006 (PDT) | Yeah, he's not a samurai-I had this placed before our plethora of categories sprung up and never got around to changing it. So all warriors before the Heian period are now "other historical figures"? If that's the case, I'll get around to changing this and I think a few others. [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 12:08, 15 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Ancient titles/names== | ||
| + | I wasn't sure exactly how to label "Abe no Hikita no Omi Hirafu", so I went with "other names", but my guess is, it's a title - this period of Japanese history is out of my realm of knowledge. How do you think it should be listed? --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 22:54, 28 October 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks good [[User:Nagaeyari|Nagaeyari]] 06:28, 29 October 2006 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:28, 29 October 2006
What's going to be our rule on Korean and Chinese romanizations? Secondly, for pages like this that are limited in English, and are therefore taken straight from a source, should we use quotation marks for the whole article? Nagaeyari 15:58, 10 September 2006 (PDT)
- Shouldn't this be in a category other than "Samurai"? Maybe cultural figures? --Kitsuno 11:33, 15 September 2006 (PDT)
Yeah, he's not a samurai-I had this placed before our plethora of categories sprung up and never got around to changing it. So all warriors before the Heian period are now "other historical figures"? If that's the case, I'll get around to changing this and I think a few others. Nagaeyari 12:08, 15 September 2006 (PDT)
Ancient titles/names
I wasn't sure exactly how to label "Abe no Hikita no Omi Hirafu", so I went with "other names", but my guess is, it's a title - this period of Japanese history is out of my realm of knowledge. How do you think it should be listed? --Kitsuno 22:54, 28 October 2006 (PDT)
Looks good Nagaeyari 06:28, 29 October 2006 (PST)
