Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| The first Bunten was held in [[1907]] in [[Ueno Park]] (in Tokyo), on the former site of the third [[Domestic Industrial Exposition]] (held in [[1890]]). The idea for such an event came, perhaps, as an effort by the Ministry of Education to serve as a mediator between the multiple factions dividing the art world at that time; however, it only served to strengthen the factionalism, by creating a political divide between those the Ministry favored and those they did not - whether personally, or in terms of style or approach. | | The first Bunten was held in [[1907]] in [[Ueno Park]] (in Tokyo), on the former site of the third [[Domestic Industrial Exposition]] (held in [[1890]]). The idea for such an event came, perhaps, as an effort by the Ministry of Education to serve as a mediator between the multiple factions dividing the art world at that time; however, it only served to strengthen the factionalism, by creating a political divide between those the Ministry favored and those they did not - whether personally, or in terms of style or approach. |
| | | |
− | Works were displayed and judged in three categories: [[yoga|Western painting]], [[Nihonga|Japanese painting]], and sculpture, with awards being given out in each category. Some artists critiqued this organization, arguing that it discouraged collaboration or fusion works across the categories. Creators working in ceramics, textiles, lacquer, metal, wood, bamboo, and certain other materials and forms were consigned to a "craft" exhibition organized by the [[Ministry of Agriculture, Commerce, and Industry]] and known as the Nôten.<ref>Nicole Coolidge Rousmaniere, ''Crafting Beauty in Modern Japan'', University of Washington Press (2007), 15.</ref> | + | Works were displayed and judged in three categories: [[yoga|Western painting]], [[Nihonga|Japanese painting]], and sculpture, with awards being given out in each category. Some artists critiqued this organization, arguing that it discouraged collaboration or fusion works across the categories. |
| | | |
| While ''Nihonga'' painter [[Takeuchi Seiho|Takeuchi Seihô]] served regularly on the Bunten jury from the beginning, [[Suzuki Shonen|Suzuki Shônen]] was among those who declined an invitation to do so, claiming he feared that bureaucrats from the Ministry would interfere with the judges' decisions.<ref>Paul Berry and Michiyo Morioka (eds.) ''Literati Modern: Bunjinga from Late Edo to Twentieth-Century Japan''. Honolulu: Honolulu Academy of Arts, 2008. p299.; Ellen Conant, "Cut from Kyoto Cloth: Takeuchi Seihô and his Artistic Milieu." Impressions 33 (2012). pp71-93. </ref> Meanwhile, on the side of the artists being judged, there were many like [[Ikeda Yoson|Ikeda Yôson]], who were rejected by the Bunten time and time again, based on the particular tastes and interests of the judges (and of the Ministry), though their works are highly regarded today.<ref>Ellen Conant (ed.), ''Nihonga: Transcending the Past''. St. Louis Art Museum, 1995. pp297-8.</ref> | | While ''Nihonga'' painter [[Takeuchi Seiho|Takeuchi Seihô]] served regularly on the Bunten jury from the beginning, [[Suzuki Shonen|Suzuki Shônen]] was among those who declined an invitation to do so, claiming he feared that bureaucrats from the Ministry would interfere with the judges' decisions.<ref>Paul Berry and Michiyo Morioka (eds.) ''Literati Modern: Bunjinga from Late Edo to Twentieth-Century Japan''. Honolulu: Honolulu Academy of Arts, 2008. p299.; Ellen Conant, "Cut from Kyoto Cloth: Takeuchi Seihô and his Artistic Milieu." Impressions 33 (2012). pp71-93. </ref> Meanwhile, on the side of the artists being judged, there were many like [[Ikeda Yoson|Ikeda Yôson]], who were rejected by the Bunten time and time again, based on the particular tastes and interests of the judges (and of the Ministry), though their works are highly regarded today.<ref>Ellen Conant (ed.), ''Nihonga: Transcending the Past''. St. Louis Art Museum, 1995. pp297-8.</ref> |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| | | |
| While the Bunten sought to unite the art world, alternative exhibitions continued to be organized, including the Nihon Bijutsuin's Inten, and the Kyoto-based ''[[Shinko bijutsuhin ten]]'' ("Exhibition of New and Old Art", first organized in [[1888]]). | | While the Bunten sought to unite the art world, alternative exhibitions continued to be organized, including the Nihon Bijutsuin's Inten, and the Kyoto-based ''[[Shinko bijutsuhin ten]]'' ("Exhibition of New and Old Art", first organized in [[1888]]). |
| + | |
| + | Creators working in ceramics, textiles, lacquer, metal, wood, bamboo, and certain other materials and forms were initially consigned to a "craft" exhibition organized by the [[Ministry of Agriculture, Commerce, and Industry]] and known as the Nôten. This was renamed the Shôkôten in 1925, when the ministries were reorganized and the exhibition began to be organized by the newly re-organized Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Two years later, however, the Teiten (the former Bunten) finally created a division for the display of "craft" works. While some crafts artists regularly display at the Nitten, others do so at the annual Japan Traditional Crafts Exhibition (''Nihon Dentô Kôgeiten''); while in many families or workshops some artists will display at one and some at the other, each individual creator typically defines themselves as associated with one or the other and does not switch between the two or attempt to exhibit at both.<ref>Nicole Coolidge Rousmaniere, ''Crafting Beauty in Modern Japan'', University of Washington Press (2007), 15.</ref> |
| + | |
| + | Following World War II, in 1946, the Imperial Exhibition (''Teiten'') was renamed the Japan Exhibition (''Nitten''); it continues under this name annually today. |
| | | |
| {{stub}} | | {{stub}} |