Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imagawa Ryoshun"

From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think it would be good to add a section or at least a few lines about his decendants - namely Imagawa Yoshimoto  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 01:50, 27 September 2006 (PDT)
 
I think it would be good to add a section or at least a few lines about his decendants - namely Imagawa Yoshimoto  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 01:50, 27 September 2006 (PDT)
 
::A better place for this might be a page on the Imagawa clan that lists the more prominent clan members?--[[User:AngusH|AngusH]] 18:12, 27 September 2006 (PDT)
 
::A better place for this might be a page on the Imagawa clan that lists the more prominent clan members?--[[User:AngusH|AngusH]] 18:12, 27 September 2006 (PDT)
 +
 +
::I think an important part of any Japanese historical figure are thier ancestors and decendants, and there are very few imagawa of note between sadayo(ryoshun) and the sengoku period, so i think some imagawa info would be very much worth it. I think it would make the article more complete. If it wasn't mentioned here, very few people would make the connection, or if they did, they wouldn't be able to verify it with this article.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 18:56, 27 September 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 20:56, 27 September 2006

I think it would be good to add a section or at least a few lines about his decendants - namely Imagawa Yoshimoto --Kitsuno 01:50, 27 September 2006 (PDT)

A better place for this might be a page on the Imagawa clan that lists the more prominent clan members?--AngusH 18:12, 27 September 2006 (PDT)
I think an important part of any Japanese historical figure are thier ancestors and decendants, and there are very few imagawa of note between sadayo(ryoshun) and the sengoku period, so i think some imagawa info would be very much worth it. I think it would make the article more complete. If it wasn't mentioned here, very few people would make the connection, or if they did, they wouldn't be able to verify it with this article. --Kitsuno 18:56, 27 September 2006 (PDT)