Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| ==Pre-Modern Printing== | | ==Pre-Modern Printing== |
| | | |
− | Throughout the pre-modern period, up until the late 16th century, printed materials in Japan were almost exclusively Buddhist texts. With the exception of the 8th century ''Hyakumantô darani'', the printing of religious texts took place in a significant volume beginning in the 11th century.<ref name=smith334>Smith. p334.</ref> | + | Throughout the pre-modern period, up until the late 16th century, printed materials in Japan were almost exclusively Buddhist texts. The vast majority of these, it is believed, were not produced to be read, but rather were produced as religious offerings. The donor or patron gained religious merit through commissioning and funding the production of the work, and from then donating it to a temple; the work, stored away inside a temple's storehouse or otherwise buried or hidden away, would then go unread.<ref>Keyes, 11.</ref> |
| + | |
| + | The printing of religious texts in significant volume took off beginning in the 11th century, the one exception being the 8th century production of the ''Hyakumantô darani''.<ref name=smith334>Smith. p334.</ref> |
| | | |
| ==Tokugawa Period== | | ==Tokugawa Period== |
Line 14: |
Line 16: |
| Scholars cite a number of potential reasons for the dominance of woodblocks over moveable type in early modern Japan. Japanese calligraphic script, and the way it was integrated into the composition of a page alongside images, was more well-suited to woodblocks, as moveable type would have demanded a shift from long strings of connected ([[running script]]) calligraphy to separated, distinct characters which could be printed each from a separate type block. Woodblock printing also allowed for the inclusion, for example, of glosses such as what is today called ''furigana'' - small syllabic ''[[kana]]'' characters placed next to the logographic ''[[kanji]]'' to identify the reading. This provided not only the pronunciation in the strictest sense of the word - meaning, the sound, and thus the ability to read the word out loud - but also served, often, as an important indication of the identity or meaning of a phrase, since one generally knows one's mother tongue more natively or fluently by sound rather than by visuals. While moveable type works best with strict grids of characters, the inclusion of such glosses, at a smaller size, and nestled up next to the "main" columns of text, called for either a much more complex system of moveable type, or for woodblocks carved for a whole page - text, glosses, images, and all. | | Scholars cite a number of potential reasons for the dominance of woodblocks over moveable type in early modern Japan. Japanese calligraphic script, and the way it was integrated into the composition of a page alongside images, was more well-suited to woodblocks, as moveable type would have demanded a shift from long strings of connected ([[running script]]) calligraphy to separated, distinct characters which could be printed each from a separate type block. Woodblock printing also allowed for the inclusion, for example, of glosses such as what is today called ''furigana'' - small syllabic ''[[kana]]'' characters placed next to the logographic ''[[kanji]]'' to identify the reading. This provided not only the pronunciation in the strictest sense of the word - meaning, the sound, and thus the ability to read the word out loud - but also served, often, as an important indication of the identity or meaning of a phrase, since one generally knows one's mother tongue more natively or fluently by sound rather than by visuals. While moveable type works best with strict grids of characters, the inclusion of such glosses, at a smaller size, and nestled up next to the "main" columns of text, called for either a much more complex system of moveable type, or for woodblocks carved for a whole page - text, glosses, images, and all. |
| | | |
− | Woodblocks were also better suited to the production of multiple editions, as a publisher could simply hold onto the blocks for a given book and reprint new copies later, never having to take apart the stereotype (the formatted, laid-out type blocks for a given page) and reassemble it for each page, or each work, as one would have to with moveable type. Finally, a third reason given for the popularity of woodblocks, and for the explosion of publishing in early modern Japan using woodblocks, was the relatively inexpensive entry cost for starting a publishing business. Rather than investing in a press (or multiple presses) and a collection of thousands of type blocks for individual characters, an entrepreneur could simply deal with one set of blocks at a time, hiring professional artisans (e.g. block-carvers and printers), or doing the work himself. The Japanese process of woodblock printing, furthermore, did not require any heavy, expensive, or technologically complex printing press, but rather was done largely by hand, using a tool called a ''[[baren]]'' to rub a piece of paper on top of an inked block. The paper itself, in the case of books, was made from ''[[kozo|kôzô]]'', that is, fibers from a plant called the "paper mulberry." | + | Woodblocks were also better suited to the production of multiple editions, as a publisher could simply hold onto the blocks for a given book and reprint new copies later, never having to take apart the stereotype (the formatted, laid-out type blocks for a given page) and reassemble it for each page, or each work, as one would have to with moveable type. Finally, a third reason given for the popularity of woodblocks, and for the explosion of publishing in early modern Japan using woodblocks, was the relatively inexpensive entry cost for starting a publishing business. Rather than investing in a press (or multiple presses) and a collection of thousands of type blocks for individual characters, an entrepreneur could simply deal with one set of blocks at a time, hiring professional artisans (e.g. block-carvers and printers), or doing the work himself. The Japanese process of woodblock printing, furthermore, did not require any heavy, expensive, or technologically complex printing press, but rather was done largely by hand, using a tool called a ''[[baren]]'' to rub a piece of paper on top of an inked block. |
| + | |
| + | The earliest printed works, such as the ''hyakumantô darani'', were printed on a paper made from hemp (J: ''asa''); however, in the Tokugawa period, paper made from ''[[kozo|kôzô]]'', that is, fibers from a plant called the "paper mulberry," became the most commonly used, along with paper made from similar plants known as ''[[mitsumata]]'' and ''[[gampi]]''. Each of these differ somewhat in their qualities, with ''gampi'' being a little darker, browner, in color; sometimes paper was recycled, with the ink residue from its previous usage turning the paper grey. Bamboo paper (J: ''tôshi'', ''gasenshi'') was also sometimes used.<ref>Keyes, 23.</ref> ''Kôzô'', however, overall, tends to be quite resilient, and soft and flexible, bending rather than creasing or breaking, and yellowing & growing brittle to a far lesser extent than modern/Western forms of wood pulp paper. |
| | | |
| Illustrators or authors would submit their designs to the publisher, who would then take over the remainder of the process. A highly skilled professional ''hangiya'' (板木屋, block-carver) would lay the design over the block - sometimes using a reproduction of the design created for this purpose by a copyist or ''hanshitagaki'' (版下書) - and use that as a guideline for carving out the blocks. ''Hangiya'' were professional artisans, and highly organized as such in craft guilds, working most often with publishers in a manner akin to independent contractors; some of the largest publishing houses had their own in-house blockcarvers, however. | | Illustrators or authors would submit their designs to the publisher, who would then take over the remainder of the process. A highly skilled professional ''hangiya'' (板木屋, block-carver) would lay the design over the block - sometimes using a reproduction of the design created for this purpose by a copyist or ''hanshitagaki'' (版下書) - and use that as a guideline for carving out the blocks. ''Hangiya'' were professional artisans, and highly organized as such in craft guilds, working most often with publishers in a manner akin to independent contractors; some of the largest publishing houses had their own in-house blockcarvers, however. |
Line 37: |
Line 41: |
| | | |
| {{stub}} | | {{stub}} |
| + | |
| + | ===Pigments=== |
| + | For the most part, illustrators, printers, and publishers chose colors which would seep into the paper and become fixed, rather than sitting atop the surface of the paper, where they might easily flake off. That said, in more expensive, higher-quality, books, certain materials such as gold, silver, and mica, along with thicker pigments which did sit atop the surface were used, and affixed using a hide-glue called ''[[nikawa]]'' (the same material used to suspend and affix the [[mineral pigments]] in traditional painting). |
| + | |
| + | Some of the most common pigments used in Tokugawa period printed materials include: |
| + | *''Sumi'' - the same black ink used for painting and calligraphy was used for printing blacks and greys. |
| + | *White pigments made from seashell (''[[gofun]]'') or lead oxide (''[[enpaku]]'') |
| + | *[[Dayflower blue]] (''tsuyukusa'') - a light blue hue which reacts easily to moisture, turning yellow. |
| + | *[[Prussian blue]] - the first chemical/artificial pigment developed in the world (i.e. deriving directly from neither vegetable or mineral sources); first used in Japan in [[1829]]; a deep, rich blue that does not fade or discolor. |
| + | *''[[Beni]]'' (safflower red), used to produce various shades of red, pink, orange, and yellow. |
| + | *Purples obtained by mixing dayflower blue with safflower red, or by other means.<ref>Keyes, 24.</ref> |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| + | *Keyes, Roger. ''Ehon: The Artist and the Book in Japan''. New York Public Library, 2006. |
| *Smith, Henry. "The History of the Book in Edo and Paris." in James McClain, et al (eds.) ''Edo & Paris: Urban Life and the State in the Early Modern Era''. Cornell University Press, 1994. pp332-352. | | *Smith, Henry. "The History of the Book in Edo and Paris." in James McClain, et al (eds.) ''Edo & Paris: Urban Life and the State in the Early Modern Era''. Cornell University Press, 1994. pp332-352. |
| <references/> | | <references/> |