Changes

From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
791 bytes added ,  03:48, 21 June 2007
Sengoku?
Line 14: Line 14:     
Maybe someone could fill in the article with information for pre-Nara periods.--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 20:53, 20 June 2007 (PDT)
 
Maybe someone could fill in the article with information for pre-Nara periods.--[[User:Bethetsu|Bethetsu]] 20:53, 20 June 2007 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Sengoku? ==
 +
 +
Why is Sengoku described as not included? I understand that much of it overlaps with the Muromachi period, but as far as I am aware it is on equal footing with the Azuchi-Momoyama Period in terms of being an "official" period; as far as I am concerned, Azuchi-Momoyama is even less official, being merely a part of Sengoku.
 +
 +
I have also seen chronologies that list 1467 as the end of the Muromachi period (though not, of course, of the Ashikaga shogunate) in order to allow for Sengoku to be a full period extending from 1467- 1600/1603/1615.
 +
 +
What do you all think? I really don't see why Sengoku should be singled out like this as not quite official enough or whatever, particularly when Azuchi-Momoyama is included. [[User:LordAmeth|LordAmeth]] 01:48, 21 June 2007 (PDT)
contributor
27,126

edits

Navigation menu