Difference between revisions of "Talk:Okami (folklore)"

From SamuraiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:Ōkami (folklore) moved to Talk:Okami (folklore): Removed macron for consistency.)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I submitted this article in response to a request I received through Private Messenging for more articles on Japanese folklore.  I wasn't sure on the proper naming on this article, so feel free to change the title to "Ōkami" or "Wolf (folklore)" or whatever seems most appropriate.  [[User:Azuki Arai|Azuki Arai]] 20:44, 27 January 2007 (PST)
 
I submitted this article in response to a request I received through Private Messenging for more articles on Japanese folklore.  I wasn't sure on the proper naming on this article, so feel free to change the title to "Ōkami" or "Wolf (folklore)" or whatever seems most appropriate.  [[User:Azuki Arai|Azuki Arai]] 20:44, 27 January 2007 (PST)
 +
 +
:Great article! I removed the macron from the article title, since for some reason this wiki won't let you search that way, so the macronless titles is what we use, and I changed the macrons to the triangular ones, which is also what we use.  An easy fix. Thanks for the article!  There are a few stylistic things that I'll probably change over - it would be better to have in text footnotes rather than in text citations, so I'll see if I can change that over, since that is pretty much how we've been doing it.  --[[User:Shogun|Kitsuno]] 20:56, 27 January 2007 (PST)

Revision as of 00:56, 28 January 2007

I submitted this article in response to a request I received through Private Messenging for more articles on Japanese folklore. I wasn't sure on the proper naming on this article, so feel free to change the title to "Ōkami" or "Wolf (folklore)" or whatever seems most appropriate. Azuki Arai 20:44, 27 January 2007 (PST)

Great article! I removed the macron from the article title, since for some reason this wiki won't let you search that way, so the macronless titles is what we use, and I changed the macrons to the triangular ones, which is also what we use. An easy fix. Thanks for the article! There are a few stylistic things that I'll probably change over - it would be better to have in text footnotes rather than in text citations, so I'll see if I can change that over, since that is pretty much how we've been doing it. --Kitsuno 20:56, 27 January 2007 (PST)