Talk:Main Page

From SamuraiWiki
Revision as of 00:08, 13 September 2006 by Shogun (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Please note any additions to the main page that must be added, and an admin will update the main page accordingly. To start discussions here, use the "+" sign under the "edit tools" category on the left.

--Kitsuno 00:19, 10 September 2006 (PDT)

I added a Kofun Period and Heian Period to the Historical Periods Nagaeyari 18:40, 10 September 2006 (PDT)

added --Kitsuno 21:26, 10 September 2006 (PDT)

Added Nara Period Nagaeyari 21:26, 10 September 2006 (PDT)

added --Kitsuno 00:36, 11 September 2006 (PDT)

I think we need an "Aristocrats" subgroup for the bios, as men like Wake no Kiyomaro and others don't belong in a general samurai bio section. Nagaeyari 06:20, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Just add a [[Category:Aristocrats]] tag in the appropriate articles, then edit the Aristocrats page and add a [[Category:Biographies]] tag.
--Kryo 07:07, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

I'm interested in a "Fauna and Flora" category. What do you think?

"Fauna and Flora"? Uh, I guess - you have some flowers of historical significance? --Kitsuno 13:28, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Yeah, there's a lot of interest in that subject when dealing with Jomon and Yayoi times. Secondly, with the mysterious addition of a Seiichi Iwao bio, I think a "Historians" bio section is worth-while. Also, Nihon Shoki and Kojiki mythology, contain animals and plants Nagaeyari 13:57, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

I definately want historians, authors, and books. --Kitsuno 14:40, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Books category begun Nagaeyari 16:13, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

I think we need a category "Background"? to put general topics like age (kazoe-doshi), the writing system, geography, plants(?) etc. in. Bethetsu 13 September 2006

Bethetsu, you write that age calc article on the spot? Fantastic job! I agree, there needs to be a catch-all on culture/traditions of SOME sort. Course, my fauna idea got shot down ;) Nagaeyari 20:55, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

I agree - I was thinking "resources" although I don't necessarily like "resources", I can't think of a better word right now.

--Kitsuno 21:08, 12 September 2006 (PDT)